Protests in Britain

The political Left in Britain love "causes" that they support (often invent themselves, in fact) and gain themselves some publicity for being the good guys and supporting "the ordinary people of Britain".

The latest in a long line of these is the UK Uncut outfit, whose clearly-stated goal is to occupy other people's property (just follow that link and check the left side) and harm them in other ways, targeting those businesses they claim (usually erroneously) are not paying huge amounts of tax due in this country.

Frankly, they are criminals, trying to hide behind the tolerant nature of our laws toward non-violent protest.

Of course, it's all really driven by the Communist puppetmasters who themselves stay conveniently hidden away so are never caught or identified; although the British Communist Party itself is usually to be found on marches and at rallies (I have photos showing this).

This piece from a new (to me) name at The Spectator, successfully debunks UK Uncut, and is worth reading through in order to gain a clearer overall picture of what these outfits are really like.

The "anti-cuts" march in London this coming weekend is a classic example of the artificiality of all this and Labour hypocrisy. Labour people are tweeting that they'll be there, spouting the Labour party line about cuts "too soon, too deep". Yet it is on the public record that Labour's Shadow Chancellor (this month's one) Ed Balls has claimed recently that he was fully supportive of the Darling deficit reduction plan which is almost identical to what the Coalition Government is implementing, both in terms of timing (identical) and amount (similar: £14 billion rather than the Coalition's £16 billion).

Therefore their whole stance is a lie, and an obvious one. Of course, those who go on these events aren't usually all that bright, on the whole, as they are obviously being fooled whenever a stunt of this nature is being pulled. The majority of such events fall into that category, and anyone capable of thinking straight would realise that and keep away.

Apart, that is, from those who are actually using it as an excuse to "get one over" on those they hate for whatever reason. Usually it is unreasoning hatred; but the Lefties are like that: full of hatred, spite and downright nastiness. They've always been the same, at least throughout my lifetime of around half a century.

Thus it is safe to ignore whatever protests these bods dream up and attend; but it will be useful to have all of them identified so that all genuinely decent people can shun them in future, which is what they all deserve!

As daffy as Gaddafi

The really ghastly ultra-loud Lefty Mehdi Hasan has tonight tweeted this:

"Disappointed to see Hugo Chavez, a man I've often defended from lazy right-wing smears, coming out and defending Gaddafi. Pretty poor."

Well, who have thought that he'd have been a defender of Chavez. Perhaps he should team up with Ken Livingstone who also has an apparent fondness for the Venezuelan ruler.

The above confession certainly reminds us that the left are very much in favour of dictators (and are often seen in their company), since they aspire to become the same themselves. Indeed, they were near-enough all Gaddafi fans until a couple of days ago.

Tweet of the day - 25 Feb 2011

From Jackart (Very British Dude), about the real world:

Politics102: Righty. "This is how the world works". Lefty "No it isn't. I want it to work this way". World works just as righty says.

Tweet of the day - 21 Feb 2011

From Jackart (Very British Dude) on the weary topic of the political left:

Left "hates" tories like a child "hates" authority. Tories look benignly upon lefties as childish idiots after whom we sometimes clean up.

Trivia of the day - 18 Feb 2011

From this Tweet by Paul Waugh, we can learn several things:

"Top trivia re new No.10 man Paul Kirby: was among 31K Liverpool council staff sent redundo notices via taxi by DHatton in 80s"

1. Paul Kirby has been around a while
2. Liverpool Council employed more than 31,000 people, at public expense, in the '80s
3. Those redundancy notices were ferried by (expensive) taxis rather than by either ordinary post or the internal mail at the council offices
4. Those mass redundancies were an earlier example of political manipulation of a situation by the Lefties of the time, just as Lewisham Council is doing now (see my preceding post).

This is useful for us now, as it shows the validity of what I wrote earlier today, and I and others have been saying for a long time. Some of us were around when these earlier anti-Conservative government actions were taken, as a way to create resentment against the Thatcher government of the time by making people suffer (by losing their jobs) largely unnecessarily, and by spending money that could have kept some jobs going on taxi fares instead.

Derek Hatton was as Red as they come, though, and cared nothing for the workforce, only for his own political agenda for which those workers were merely pawns in the game.

As so often happens, a little history serves as a good reminder of what has happened before, that we are seeing again now.

Left behind

Although voting intention figures are (as expected) currently good for Labour, it isn't because the people of Britain believe their tosh about the economy.

Although tribalism undoubtedly plays a part in any poll, so it'll never be clear-cut one way or the other, the one published yesterday by YouGov (PDF file) contains some interesting figures. The Independent's John Rentoul has today tweeted the answer to this question:

"Who do you think is most to blame for the current spending cuts?"

It turns out to be Con-LD coalition 22%; Last Labour government 40%, which is a suitably convincing majority for Labour being the ones blamed by the population at large.

Labour really have much lower credibility than they (and their mouthpieces) like to suggest, as people are no longer being taken in by them. Their good buddy at the huge Unite public-sector Union, Len McCluskey, has been caught out by Channel 4's FactCheck making dodgy claims regarding the nation's deficit and debt, getting a Fiction score on the FactCheck meter.

The deficit turns out to be the largest since 1945 (the end of the Second World War), completely contradicting McCluskey's claim that it "isn't all that big, historically). He wasn't quite as far out with regard to the overall national debt, which is the highest for just forty years or so (viz. since the late '60s). So that's all right then!

Typical lefty! Hasn't a clue, and is either dishonest himself or has been fed duff info by someone else who is either dishonest or just plain incompetent. Whichever way it turns out to be, the message is that these bods have no place commenting on such topics anyway and should never be invited or allowed to do so.

The Left are weaklings

It has occurred to me just how weak the political left really are - and they obviously know it.

The clues to this are very clearly shown in the methods they employ to maintain any kind of significant foothold in the political arena.

They need indoctrination of the young and impressionable via lefty teachers and uni lecturers; they need the Unions; and they need (heavily-Unionised) largely friendly big media, especially the broadcasters such as the BBC.

They also need bullying tactics and being truly nasty; they need dishonesty and deception as a way of life; and they need their standard tools of stealing as much as they can get away with from everyone else to fund their schemes and propaganda.

They also desperately need intimidation and fear to silence those who would dare to speak truth, as Harriet Harman's so-called "equalities" agenda has demonstrated very clearly. Their often extremely nasty behaviour and attitude shows their true nature as desperate and weak bullies, as any psychologist would be able to confirm.

There must by now be thousands of examples on record somewhere that could be compiled onto a suitable website (i.e. not a blogsite, which is the wrong format for this) as a definitive and authoritative verification of this. All of these are very well documented, are generally obvious to anyone paying any real attention, and have been going on in this country (and others around the world) for decades.

They don't have what it takes to deal with reality, so they try to subvert language to mean what they want it to mean (another known psychological deception trick) and therein lies another very obvious clue. We just need to be sufficiently attention to pick up on these things when they occur. The word "progressive" is this year's best example of this trickery.

Without these manipulative tools, and the backing of corrupting and subversive organisations such as Common Purpose and their buddies, they would be nowhere. Humanity, in its enlightened state, naturally shies away from the political left, despite the way the lefties try to dress up their true motives and intentions to suggest they are "for the people" - which they never really are. It's the soft-sell approach, and it's fake.

It takes a lot of force and coercion, fear and intimidation, manipulation and psychological trickery to gain any kind of significant standing in the political arena, and this is nowadays better appreciated since online resources have exposed Common Purpose, the Frankfurt School agenda and many other lefty subversion methodologies that are being put into practice right now in many parts of the world, though thankfully not so much here in Britain since last May.

Even here, though, the placemen are still at work and the seeds sown during the Labour years are still proving troublesome weeds to kill off. Some (UKIP supporters in particular) still haven't sussed this out properly, and shoot themselves in the foot by using it as a stick with which to beat the Conservatives who - for all their faults - remain the only hope for Britain. Perhaps those UKIP mental children will grow up one day, instead of bolstering the left which is all they do in practice: one can but hope so...

We know from our school-days not to put up with bullies, and that they are cowards and weaklings when one looks behind the façade. That's how we must always face up to the political left, whether politicians, media, think tanks, unions or whatever. They are all the same, because if they hadn't been so, they would no longer be supporters of (and working for) the left. It is as black-and-white as that!